Sunday, September 12, 2010

Kazu's post..-.-"

Because that fat-ass won't post, I will.
I'm kidding about the fat-ass part :P
Well.. not really

ANYWAYS

African Americans have an official language now! It's called Ebonics. What is the difference compared to english? Well; instead of saying My, you say Mah. Instead of saying School, you say Scoo'. You get it? It's an actual language. An Official language. How much more racist can you get, America? I mean WTF?? They're still speaking english! So just because they say "'Sup dawg, you coo'?" instead of "Hey. Are you good?", you give them a language?? That's just not right. At all. You just don't do that!
However, I DO find it interesting how you can take a language, mess with it and make it a brand NEW language. I should do that too! Here.

I am a igpay.

Naww, that didn't work.
Uhhh...

IJustinIsAwesome AmJustinIsAwesome AJustinIsAwesome PigJustinIsAwesome

THERE YOU GO!
A language we will all learn to love.. I'll call it... JIA! :D

Anyways,
If we get 1000 views a day, we'll start doing give-a-ways regularly (twice a month), we'll be giving away the iPod touch, iPhone 4 [You pay for the contract, we buy the phone], iPod nano, iWatch, etc. If we get MORE than 1000, we'll start giving away BIG stuff like iPads, video cards, etc. Tell people about our blog!
Merci


Peach out,
Justin

40 comments:

  1. You post here advertising a site.. yet you say nothing about this post?

    ReplyDelete
  2. "It has been used more often to refer to African American Vernacular English"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry, forgot to site.

    Wikipedia is the source

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ok, I worded that part wrong. The first sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  6. um.... hey mr anonymous... your source was *Wikipedia* any idiot who knows how to type can post on there. You might have posted it your self :)

    if u want credibilty, wikipedia is not the way to get it.

    just sayin.

    ReplyDelete
  7. ohay nday ustinjay?

    iay ikelay ouryay ewnay anguagelay. oweverhay, adlysay iay ontday inkthay itay illway ickstay.

    igpay atinlay isay osay uchmay oolercay.

    ReplyDelete
  8. ehhh
    I don't usually do this, but I'm not in the mood to argue.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey; you delete my post on your blog, I delete yours.

    ReplyDelete
  10. i dont get it :S, are you calling yourself a a-hole?? or wikipedia and also who is this admin guy and what is this power of "comment removal"

    ReplyDelete
  11. I've noticed that you keep this retard's comments up, yet not mine?

    ReplyDelete
  12. who is this gaylord? the president? or the arch duche of cantibary? am i right?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Aiight, look. You are really pissing me off... If you post shit like that again I will ban your IP. yes, it can detect proxies.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Spam all you want. The min. I get home I'm banning your IP.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm deleting your responses because..
    1. You deleted mine for no reason
    2. You are spamming me like a mother fucker
    3. I'm in that mood

    Oh, and congrats; you found my "secret portal" to my blogs info! Cause you know, it's secret if it's where everyone can see it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. HAHAHAHAHA? what's so funny, the fact that your admin has to protect you from his own stupidity, or are you doing some more blind worshiping (which is pretty much the only thing permitted on this site.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Dude.. go read the "Mods" post. I don't care if people say stuff against me, cause I'll just argue back. YOU, however, are different; you spam me.

    ReplyDelete
  19. no... I posted and argument and you took it down. Then I put it up and you took it down (and on and on)

    ReplyDelete
  20. But you missed out the part before that; it was that part that pissed me off. I did forget that part cause I try not to remember those things, but AFTER that, you kept on spamming the same "argument" over and over.

    ReplyDelete
  21. it's a logical argument. How is it spam?

    Oh right, it makes you look like a fool.

    ReplyDelete
  22. By the by, I actually posted that comment under modding, The only reason you didn't take that down, though is because one of the following:

    1. you haven't been beaten yet
    2. It doesn't accuse you of racism
    3. You don't know it's me yet (well... now you do)

    ReplyDelete
  23. Nope, thats not it. I don't care if I look like a fool. It's spam when you post the same shit 5 times or more. Shit, even 2 times or more is considered double posting and you could get banned for that on other websites. So tell me, how is it not spam when you post it 400 times? Not literally, but you get the point.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 1. I haven't been beaten cause everything I have said is true. If you do beat me, I will take down the post or change it.
    2. Racism doesn't go with gaming.
    3. Now I do... but you did post a good argument so I'm not taking it down.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Unless you want it taken down, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No, I beat you, so you removed it. then I put it back up, but AFTER that, you kept on deleting my argument over and over...

    Why does argument have quotation marks?

    Also, what do you mean by "pissing you off?" Because I'm assuming that it means that you got owned...

    ReplyDelete
  27. Again, I don't care if I get owned. Kent does it all the time.. It's annoying but if I get owned, thats my fault.
    Pissing me off probably means I was in a horrid mood that day; just about anything pisses me off when I'm in a bad mood, and I chose to dump it on you.

    ReplyDelete
  28. My other argument wasn't logical?

    It countered yours. It was good enough to make you cover it up. I'd say it was pretty good.

    Double posting? Do you even know what that means? It's when you put to posts from yourself consecutively, something you just did. However, double posting doesn't exist on sites such as these because there is no option to edit previously posted comments (maybe there is, but not for anonymous posters).

    I NEVER spammed you. I posted a response and then reposted it every time you took it down.

    I think you're confused about one of my comments,

    when I said "It doesn't accuse you of racism,"
    It was a reference to this particular article and why you where taking down these comments and not those.

    Whether you meant it or not, this article is racist. Clearly underlined by the fact that you called Ebonics the official language of African Americans, which would suggest that you believe that as a whole, African Americans endorse slang. Which would include such people as Barrack Obama, when in actuality, he speaks properly and formally.

    ReplyDelete
  29. For clarity: that last post was intended to be above your last post.

    Don't try to divert. If that is true then why does it matter if I reposted it? After you cooled down you should have left it.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Yep, I know what double posting means.
    As I said, I took them down cause you were spamming the website.
    I called Ebonics the official language of African Americans because where I read the info on (wiki), it said " it has been used more often to refer to African American Vernacular English".

    ReplyDelete
  31. Obviously, I didn't leave it because I didn't feel like going back to that.

    ReplyDelete
  32. ... So you went through the trouble of deleting my posts repeatedly, rather than telling me that you where in a bad mood the first time you did it...

    If you know what it means, then why did you accuse me of it.

    I'm not spamming if I'm posting related material

    As I said, the article is racist, regardless of how you intended it to be.

    I already pointed out that it is called that because of the origin of the language (African Americans), however, it is not their official language. It's slang, and it's used by both African American and white people. Calling it their official language links it to ALL African Americans. Do you understand?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Bad decision, I know..
    You're spamming if you post the SAME related material 20 times.
    And yes, I get your point.

    ReplyDelete
  34. It is the same material, however, you deleted it. I reposted it to let people see it and possibly argue back against me. I never would have reposted it if I didn't want it to be seen.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Dude.. look I'm ending this conversation here, cause I gotta do homework. I'm going to set the system to automatically mark your posts as spam, and I'll unmark it when I come back so we can continue; toodle-doo for now

    ReplyDelete
  36. ... You are very confused.

    The meaning behind the article is racist. A kid asking for a cracker isn't racist because it could (and does) mean something else.

    He obviously did mean that ebonics is the language of African Americans, he said that it was in a rather strait forward sentence, and then he repeated the idea by calling america racist for making it a language (if he didn't think that ebonics was the language of African Americans then race/racism wouldn't come into play at all.)

    ReplyDelete
  37. Dude.. stop posting on this. It's useless. It's getting annoying. From now on I will delete any and all posts about what you're saying now.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I posted that in response to what Kazu said, I'm going to defend myself, but other than that, I'm done.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Ok I'm sorry I understand why you would feel that this article is racist. From now on we'll try not to word things in this way. Sorry for causing trouble.

    ReplyDelete